|
|
 |
| |
Time
Use Survey |
| |
|
| |
Gender Responsive Budgeting
Initiative, Finance Division and Federal Bureau of Statistics
(FBS) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in 2006
according to which FBS will carry out a Time Use Survey
(TUS) on a national basis covering approximately 20,000
households. This is the first time that a survey of this
kind is being conducted on a national level in Pakistan.
The MoU was signed between National Project Director,
GRBI/ Joint Secretary (EF-P), Finance Division and Deputy
Director General, FBS.
|
| |
Why a Time Use Survey |
| |
The Time Use Survey (TUS) is
one of the tools of Gender Responsive Budgeting survey
which is meant to reveal the macroeconomic implications
of unpaid care work (such as caring for children and sick
people and general housework) and to ensure that the government's
budget and associated policies ensure that this work happens
efficiently and effectively.
|
| |
|
| |
Approach |
| |
The Pakistan Time Use Survey
is utilizing a diary-based approach, in which selected
respondents are asked in a face-to-face interview as to
what activities they performed in each half-hour of the
preceding day (a 'yesterday' diary). The survey is being
conducted in four 'tranches', one in each quarter, so
as to allow for capturing of any variation in seasonal
activity. Different sets of 5,000 households each will
be sampled per quarter. |
| |
Time Frame |
| |
The total duration of the survey
as per MoU is eighteen (18) months which includes preparatory
work, field work, analysis and report-writing. Since the
survey has to cover all seasonal variations, therefore,
the fieldwork would span over twelve months.
|
| |
Update as of January 2007 |
| |
The work on the preparation
stage of Time Use Survey (TUS) has been completed which
includes:
TUS Questionnaire
Coding List and Index.
Category-wise Activities List
Training Manual for Field Enumerators/Supervisors.
Detailed Action Plan.
Sample List/Plan
Tabulation Plan
Pre-testing/pilot of the questionnaire was carried
out at the field level to determine the quality and
adequacy of the responses. Taking into account the gaps/shortfalls,
the questionnaire was revised accordingly.
Thereafter, the training of enumerators along with
field work started in December 2006.
|
|
 |